John Locke Essay Competition约翰·洛克写作竞赛参赛指南!

1赛事介绍
一年一度的John Locke Essay Competition(约翰·洛克论文竞赛)的评委由牛津大学教授组成。每年暑期,竞赛吸引了全球最擅长思考和写作的中学生。往届优胜者遍布哈耶普斯牛剑世界名校。

比赛分为15岁-18岁的高年级组和15岁以下的低年级组。高年级组的参赛题目涉及政治、哲学等7个人文社科领域,共二十一个可选题,15岁及以下的低年级参赛者的写作题目是五个有趣的跨学科话题。

极高含金量、世界性奖项、免费参与、获得学术论文写作经验,这些是准申请生不可错过此项比赛的理由!

2赛事基本信息
烧脑竞赛 | John Locke Essay Competition约翰·洛克论文竞赛参赛指南已更新!官网地址
https://www.johnlockeinstitute.com/essay-competition

烧脑竞赛 | John Locke Essay Competition约翰·洛克论文竞赛参赛指南已更新!时间安排
英文2022年赛季官网时间暂未公布(等待2月份公布和放题)。
以下为2021年赛季时间参考:
竞赛时间:2021年6月30日;
提交截止日期:2021年7月14日;
通知入围候选人:2021年9月;
获奖者在牛津举行的颁奖典礼上公布。

2022新赛季题目已公布,参考链接:

《2022John Locke约翰·洛克写作竞赛题目公布啦!》

2022年John Locke论文竞赛已经放题啦!

可扫码添加微信咨询

【免费领取】历年相关获奖论文学习

烧脑竞赛 | John Locke Essay Competition约翰·洛克论文竞赛参赛指南已更新!参赛要求
1.个人参赛,各个国家、各个学校的学生都可以参加;
2.参赛者年龄:15-18高年级组,参赛者在截止提交稿件时不得超过18岁;15岁以下低年级组,ddl时不得超过15岁;
3.每篇文章只需回答所选主题类别中的一个问题,且不得超过2000字;(不包括图表、数据表、脚注、参考书目或作者声明);
4.以pdf附件格式提交,附件的标题应为姓氏拼音、名字拼音,如POPHAM, Alexander。

烧脑竞赛 | John Locke Essay Competition约翰·洛克论文竞赛参赛指南已更新!适合人群
对Philosophy, Politics, Economics, History, Psychology, Theology and Law等人文学科方向感兴趣、或是想展现自己人文特质的理工科学生。建议托福105+,或有着较好的英文阅读、表达能力。

烧脑竞赛 | John Locke Essay Competition约翰·洛克论文竞赛参赛指南已更新!考察能力
基本知识结构
逻辑和辩证分析能力
独立思考能力
议论文的基本写作格式和技巧

烧脑竞赛 | John Locke Essay Competition约翰·洛克论文竞赛参赛指南已更新!如何提交
1.官网注册
2.补充信息:
https://www.johnlockeinstitute.com/submit-essay)

烧脑竞赛 | John Locke Essay Competition约翰·洛克论文竞赛参赛指南已更新!奖项设置
来自牛津大学的资深教师担任评委。每年竞赛会评选出一篇最佳文章(Best Essay)。

高年级组以每个话题为单位(哲学、政治、经济、历史、心理、神学、法律),每个话题会评选出优秀上榜文章,并从中选出一、二、三等奖(学科奖)。低年级组为一个参赛单位,评选出优秀上榜文章,并从中选出一、二、三等奖。只有以上这些上榜文章的学生会获得参赛证书。

一般情况下,截止日期后的一个半月公布优秀上榜文章(去年为2021年7月14日)。John Locke Institute有举办学术研讨会暨优秀文章颁奖晚宴的惯例,邀请这些优秀学生到牛津参会,每个话题的一、二、三等奖和最佳文章会在晚宴当天公布(2022年具体安排未更新,可能因疫情等原因暂定)。

3往届题目参考
哲学
Q1. Are there some subjects about which we should not even ask questions?
Q2. What is slavery? Is jury duty? Is conscription? Is income tax?
Q3. Are you more moral than most people you know? How do youknow? Should you strive to be more moral? Why or why not?

政治
Q1: Discrimination on the basis of race is widely condemned, but on the basis of  nationality it is widely accepted. Is it not odd that you may not discriminate against me for where my great-great-grandparents were born, but you may discriminate against me for where my parents were born?
Q2: Should the John Locke Institute change its name?
Q3: Do we need Greta?

经济
Q1: How would the education sector change if governments were no longerinvolved?
Q2: There is considerable excess demand for undergraduate places at Oxford. Theadmissions process rations supply by favouring cleverer students at the expense ofothers. Is this fair? Does it exacerbate inequality? What is the University’s optimalresponse to this scarcity?
Q3: Should we abolish the minimum wag?

历史
Q1: Should we judge those from the past by the standards of today? How willhistorians in the future judge us?Q2: Has the ‘construct of gender’ been more beneficial or more harmful tohumanity throughout history?
Q3: ‘More history has happened in Oxford, per square foot, than any other placein the world.’ Discuss.“

心理
Q1: Do we do everything we do to maximise our own utility?
Q2: ‘The function of religions and cults, including the political or ideological ones,is to short-circuit the normal ‘common sense’ process of doubt,,investigation,further doubt, further investigation... a belief system only requires a rule book(sacredscripture, Das Kapital, or whatever) and a good memory.’ Is this true? Doesit matter?
Q3: Who is responsible for my mental health?

神学
Q1: Is Christianity a religion of peace?
Q2: Why did Jesus of Nazareth reserve his strongest condemnation for the self-righteous?
Q3: Did God create coronavirus?

法律
Q1: Should ‘innocent until proven guilty’ apply not only to courts of law, but alsoto public censure?
Q2: To what extent does a codified constitution help or hinder liberty?
Q3: When should force of law prevent a transaction, entered into freely betweentwo competent, consenting adults?

报名通道已开启,有想法以及需要报名的,扫码咨询!

还能【免费领取】全部获奖作品!

翰林文科竞赛课程体系流程图

翰林文科竞赛课程体系流程图

 

翰林国际教育资讯二维码